This Question is Possibly Answered

1 "correct" answer available (4 pts) 2 "helpful" answers available (2 pts)
2 Replies Last post: Jan 27, 2010 4:05 PM by Vladimir Ikryanov  
lee   4 posts since
Aug 14, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Jan 26, 2010 10:59 PM

Question about digitally signing outdated version

Just wanted to confirm that unzipping your jar files (jexplorer-1.9.jar, comfyj-2.4.jar, jniwrap-3.6.1.jar) using a OSX then repacking so we can sign them was okay? Unpacking on windows comes up with warnings about replacing file.

 

Thanks

Lee

Vladimir Ikryanov TeamDev Ltd. 1,013 posts since
Apr 24, 2006
Currently Being Moderated
2. Jan 27, 2010 4:05 PM in response to: lee
Re: Question about digitally signing outdated version

Hi Lee,


Please note that we do not recommend you to re-jar'ing JExplorer library because we obfuscate it. JExplorer JAR file may contain files with case sensitive names. In other words it may contain files such as a.class and A.class in a same package due to obfuscation. But when you extract the contents of this JAR to a case insensitive file system such files just got overwritten by each other and a required file simply disappears. It’s possible, for example, when you extract a contents of a JAR file to some directory on a Windows system.


Regards,

Vladimir Ikryanov

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...